The Unintended Consequences of Food Status

When it comes to proving your mettle, bigger is better:


Northwestern University researchers found that people equate larger food portions with higher social standing. For example, study participants believed that people who opted for a large coffee had more social status than those who chose a medium or small coffee, even when the price was the same.

The study also found that people who feel powerless (such as those in lower socioeconomic groups) selected larger pieces of bagels than others, and chose larger smoothies when they were at a social event than when they were alone.

I haven’t read the paper, but I wonder if they controlled for gender. And geography, for that matter. I come from NY, and I don’t get the impression ordinary people use this sort of value system.

1 thought on “The Unintended Consequences of Food Status”

  1. I try and explain this to my family, but I’m not sure it has any effect. We’re italian, so huuuuge pasta dinners are a family staple. They’re kind, but always give me weird looks when I refuse it for less starchy foods.

    Like

Leave a Reply to Lucy Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s